<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Gumbo &#187; Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/category/reviews/companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com</link>
	<description>A potpourri of Web Development, Linux, and Windows tips, tidbits, and observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Removes Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/10/01/microsoft-removes-chrome/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-removes-chrome</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/10/01/microsoft-removes-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=3632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in Feb, Google proved by setting up about 100 "synthetic queries and unique web sites," that Microsoft was stealing their search results. They reported this in this article, and in their blog. Microsoft had a weasel word response denying &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/10/01/microsoft-removes-chrome/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in Feb, Google proved by setting up about 100 "synthetic queries and unique web sites," that Microsoft was stealing their search results.  They reported this in <a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-bing-is-cheating-copying-our-search-results-62914" title="Microsoft steals Google results">this article</a>, and in <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/microsofts-bing-uses-google-search.html" title="Microsoft steals Google results">their blog</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/chromekill35.jpg"><img src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/chromekill35.jpg" alt="" title="chromekill35" width="600" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3633" /></a></p>
<p>Microsoft had a <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-we-do-not-copy-googles-results/8557" title="Microsoft response">weasel word response</a> denying it. The gist of the response was that Microsoft "watched" what it's users searched for, and  the pages they went to and from that, gleaned what their search results should be to a particular query.  That means Microsoft had to keep track of billions of search queries continually, and the pages users clicked on to that query, and then recall it when the same query came up again.  I'm not sure I believe this.  It's much easier to just copy Google.  That all happen in February.</p>
<p>Fast forward to two weeks ago, and we have Microsoft, through a "security update,"  <a href=" http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/09/13/microsoft-swaps-bing-into-your-firefox-search/" title="Microsoft inserts Bing">inserting the Bing search bar into every new browser page in Firefox</a>.  It was annoying, and a pain to remove.</p>
<p>This week, we had yet another more serious Microsoft intrusion into our computers, again, through a "security update," they "inadvertently"  <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/faulty-microsoft-av-update-nukes-chrome-browser/9515" title="Microsoft removes Chrome">removed Google's Chrome web browser</a> from  user's computers.  Not only did they remove it, but you could not re-install it because Microsoft called it a virus.  </p>
<p>Microsoft said that about 3000 users had Chrome removed from their computers.  They issued a patch to fix the problem, but users would have to manually reload Chrome.  Come on, Microsoft, why was it just Chrome.  </p>
<p>It's a good thing, we can trust Microsoft, that Microsoft always has good intentions, that they always have just our best interest at heart, and that they would not blow away another competitors software intentionally.   We can trust Microsoft, can't we?</p>
<p>When Microsoft issued Service Pack 3 for Window's XP, they started actively communicating back and forth to your computer, unbeknownst to most users.  They got more blatant about this when they released Vista, in that, if you didn't verify your license on-line within 30 days, your computer would gradually degrade.  You also had to maintain an Internet connection for them to verify periodically that your license was valid.</p>
<p>Now, you can't download any Microsoft software until they check your computer, with their "Microsoft Genuine Advantage" license checker software, to see that all their software on your computer has a valid license .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/chromekill1.jpg"><img src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/chromekill1.jpg" alt="" title="chromekill1" width="180" height="122" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3636" /></a></p>
<p>I love the names they use to intrude into your computer and your life, "Microsoft Genuine Advantage" and "security update."</p>
<p>Why is Microsoft doing this? Well, back in April, Chrome passed Microsoft Internet Explorer in browser usage, and is now <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp" title="Chrome the second most used browser">the second most used browser</a> behind Firefox.</p>
<p>Apple has passed Microsoft in total revenue. It's quarterly revenue was $28B, Microsoft's was $20B, and Google's was $9B. These three giants are at war.</p>
<p>It seems, war brings out the worse in people and companies.  Microsoft, however, is in a unique position, in that, it controls your computer. I have said before Microsoft's power resides in its <a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/03/22/windows-security-updates-a-different-perspective/" title="Security Updates">security updates</a>.  They have brainwashed user's to believe that they have to load the security updates, even though the user has no clue as to what is in the update. </p>
<p>It seems to me that the real malware going into your computer comes from Microsoft, not from hacker's.  Hacker's for the most part have been gradually neutralized with sustained vigilance, and international computer laws.</p>
<p>Both Microsoft and Apple have architected a proprietary cocoon around their products.  If you use their products, they force you to do it their way to exclude competitors, and keep you locked into only using their products.  You can see from the above that Microsoft is far worse, than Apple.</p>
<p>For the life of me though, I don't understand why people stay with these two companies. What's the alternative?  </p>
<p>The alternative is you can have a free operating system, Linux, that runs better than Microsoft's operating system, with a nice desktop, just like the Window's desktop, with all the applications you're use to, that are just as good and sometimes better than Microsoft's applications, for free.  And there is no need for anti-virus, or anti-malware software, or for security updates.</p>
<p>You can try out the operating system by loading a DVD, without altering your Windows system, in case you don't like it.  I don't understand why people don't give one of the <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/10-best-linux-distros-704584" title="Linux Distros">Linux distros</a> a try.</p>
<p>People are creatures of habit.  They would rather put up with Chrome being removed from their computer, then try something new.  They like Microsoft's tit.  They like that Microsoft, with its security updates, takes care of them.  They like being forced to use the Internet Explorer browser, the worse browser on the planet.  In the end, Window's user's get just the milk that Microsoft wants to give them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/10/01/microsoft-removes-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding IT jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/09/01/finding-it-jobs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=finding-it-jobs</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/09/01/finding-it-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=3413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently went job hunting, due to my contract expiring. I was working as a contractor to the government, so despite Obama's claim that he has been creating jobs, the Federal government is cutting back its budget, and jobs, at &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/09/01/finding-it-jobs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently went job hunting, due to my contract expiring. I was working as a contractor to the government, so despite Obama's claim that he has been creating jobs, the Federal government is cutting back its budget, and jobs, at least for contractors.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job25.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3416" title="job25" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job25.jpeg" alt="" width="290" height="199" /></a> <a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job4.jpeg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3420" title="job4" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job4.jpeg" alt="" width="183" height="275" /></a></p>
<p>I am about to start a new job. I carefully documented the process of finding a job, and I thought it might be helpful to review some of the things I found, in the hopes that there might be some useful information for others.</p>
<p>My new job starts on September 6th. The entire process took seven weeks. Considering that most companies leave you with a pitiful two weeks severance. Two weeks is not enough, your former company is not doing you any favors with two weeks severance.</p>
<p>If two weeks severance happens to you, one of the first things you should do after you get your last paycheck is apply for unemployment.  You should not wait.  You don't get any unemployment compensation from the day you are let go, it starts from day you apply for unemployment. Since you don't know how long your going to be out of work, apply for unemployment immediately.</p>
<p>Ok, let's go through the process. I was notified on July 18th. The first thing you need to do is get your resume together. This is an advertisement of your job skill to the world. You should have a resume for each job type you are applying for, specifically tailored to the type of job you want. This is your chance to "toot your horn," talk about everything you have accomplished, whether alone, or in a team. Talk about any bonuses or awards you have won, and any educational courses you have taken. Take out everything on your resume, including past jobs, that don't have anything to do with the type of job you want. Keep time to recent time, like the last five or six years, and compress everything before that. Have a section on your job skills you bring to the job. Check for grammar and spelling, and put it in a word document format.  The purpose of the resume is to get an interview, and for you to have something to talk about in the interview.</p>
<p>You want to decide where you want to work. The last job I ended up 40 miles from my house, and as time went by, and gas prices went up, it started to take a toll on me both financially and weariness from driving to and from work. I looked for a job in an area that had little traffic and easy access from my home. I had jobs pop up that were in other cities, or were a traffic nightmare to get to the job site. I would recommend, at least for the first month or two, you concentrate on close to home areas.</p>
<p>It took me until Thursday, July 21st to finish the resumes. I was now ready to get my advertisement out into to world and look for work.</p>
<p>My first stop was Craigslist for the city where I wanted to work. If you go to craigslist, and look under jobs, you'll find jobs listed by specific geographic location. Find one you like, and send them a resume. I would also visit the web site of specific companies where you might want to work, and see if they have any job openings.</p>
<p>The week of 7/26, I started visiting all the job sites looking for jobs in my area.  I did this daily until I got an offer letter.  You'll find new jobs are posted every day.  Here, are some of the job sites I used:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="craigslist" href="http://www.craigslist.org/about/sites">Craigslist</a></li>
<li><a title="Dice" href="http://www.dice.com/">Dice</a></li>
<li><a title="Careerbuilder" href="http://www.careerbuilder.com/">CareerBuilder</a></li>
<li><a title="Monster" href="http://www.monster.com/">Monster</a></li>
<li><a title="itjobs" href="http://www.itjobs.com/">itjobs</a></li>
<li><a title="jobs for programmers" href="http://www.prgjobs.com/">jobs for programmers</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Your local paper also has a jobs section you should look at that you can find on their web site.  There are more sites out there, and if readers would like to point them out in comments, I'm sure others will appreciate.</p>
<p>If you want a lot of phone calls, I recommend you post your resume for public viewing on Dice, number one. I had every headhunter in the area calling me; they all use it.</p>
<p>You'll end up doing a lot of pre-qualification phone interviews. The people you'll talk with are headhunters, third party contracting companies, and directly with a Human Resource person at the companies with jobs.  If you sound good to the person on the phone, you'll get an interview.  Have a good story of your past experience, and say it with warmth and enthusiasm. It comes across over the phone.</p>
<p>Headhunters make their money from companies needing workers. The game is to find as many people as they can that are qualified for a job. Headhunters frequent Dice, because they see your entire resume and can match you to a job.  If your hired, the headhunter gets a commission, and the company is out some money that they normally don't have to spend.  Some headhunters want to meet with you, and promise to work with you.  That's a crock.  Your wasting your time meeting with them, unless you have nothing better to do, don't bother.  There's nothing exclusive about you to them.  They  would rather send two or three people for a job, to better insure they will make money.</p>
<p>Third party companies have a contract with their client companies to provide workers. They hire workers and pay them. They make their money by charging, usually twice as much, for your services to the client company.  Nice for them.  They will put you through programming tests to prove your the perfect fit for the client's job. There OK, the trouble here is usually as soon as the job is complete, you're let go, and since your contract with the third party company is contingent on the job, you lose your job with the third party company also.  There's no loyalty here, and don't expect it.  If your talking to a third party company, an alarm bell should go off in your head to check the job's longevity.</p>
<p>The same goes for contract-to-hire jobs. If they don't like you, you don't have a job, only quicker than with other jobs. Don't take contract-to-hire jobs if you want a full time job.</p>
<p>Who you really want to hear from is the Human Resource people from the company with the job.  The good HR people are looking on line, on Dice, and posting jobs on craigslist, for quality people they need. This saves their company third-party and headhunter fees and makes hiring you a plus for them. The company has an opening, a need for your services, and usually it makes for a good interview, and job offer.</p>
<p>On interviewing, I would be prepared to feel euphoric about your first, and maybe, second interview, like you knocked it out of the park, and not get hired. Why? You'll have "puke" mouth. You'll tell them about all your weaknesses, and what you don't know, just to be "honest."  Chalk the first couple of interviews up to re-learning how to interview. Your going to blow them, just accept it. Go to these interviews, and try for the job, then go back home, and figure out what you said that you shouldn't have said. That's what you eliminate on your next interview.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job55.jpeg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3424" title="job55" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job55.jpeg" alt="" width="400" height="308" /></a>Interviewing is a process, the first couple, you trip all over yourself, after the fifth or sixth, your more polished, you don't tell them anything negative, and rave about what you've done, and your experience, all the while jumping around in your seat showing them how excited and interested you are in the job. You get the idea. Do some homework, when interviewing with companies, but just enough to understand the job they've posted, and nothing more.</p>
<p>I've done extensive research on a company, only to be let down when they didn't offer me a job. Don't fall in love with a company before you get a job offer.  Don't do that to your emotions and well being.  Purposely wait to do your in depth research on a company until after you get the job offer to decide if you want the job.</p>
<p>One more thing for you IT guys, wear a coat and tie. Even though you wear jeans and a T-shirt normally, the employer wants to know you care enough about their job to dress up. I had a hiring manager dress up for the interview and tell me that, they expected the same from applicants.  It was one of the reasons, I believe, I got a job offer. Do it. Better dress well, then not.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job75.jpeg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3425" title="job75" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job75.jpeg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>Around the fourth week you should have three or four interviews lined up in one week, and you'll be in flow. One or two of these companies will, hopefully, make you an offer.  It's a numbers game, the more interviews, the higher chance that you'll get an offer.   Don't stop until you get an offer letter.  I've had companies imply in the interview that they want to hire you, and never get back to you.  Stop when you get an offer letter for a job that you want, until then keep interviewing.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job3.jpeg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3426" title="job3" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/job3.jpeg" alt="" width="206" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>It took me seven weeks, and I didn't waste a lot of time. I would say that that's the minimum amount of time it takes to get a job. I don't see how it could be done in two weeks. It's just not going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/09/01/finding-it-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borders Going Out of Business</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/08/11/borders-going-out-of-business/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=borders-going-out-of-business</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/08/11/borders-going-out-of-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=3368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was sad to find out Borders was going out of business. I guess I'm partly responsible for that, after all, I haven't bought a book from Border's in a long while. A few years ago Borders was my absolute &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/08/11/borders-going-out-of-business/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was sad to find out Borders was going out of business. I guess I'm partly responsible for that, after all, I haven't bought a book from Border's in a long while.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/borders2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3369" title="borders2" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/borders2.jpg" alt="" width="360" height="85" /></a>A few years ago Borders was my absolute favorite bookstore for technical books. I loved their large selection. I loved being able to pick up the book in my hand, skim through the book to decide if I liked the font, the pictures, the code. I wanted an author I understood. I'd look at the table of contents and see if it was laid out in an organized manner. I'd feel the heft of the book. I didn't like those 1000 page colossal universal references. Who wanted to plow through trying to read 1000 pages, or even holding it in your hand while you were trying to read it. I hated those floppy paperbacks that flopped around like a fish. I wanted a paperback, but with a little stiffness.</p>
<p>As I evaluated and read a multitude of technical books, I gradually began to form an opinion on the technical book publishers. Who I could trust, who just slopped books together to make a quick buck, what series had a poor concept, and who did a good job of making the writing readable. Out of that came <a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/12/26/technical-book-publishers-a-review/">my article reviewing technical book publishers</a>.</p>
<p>As I would thumb through Border's collection, I would sometimes have a difficult decision between a couple of books. Which to buy?</p>
<p>In the past, say three years ago, I would eventually pick one of the books, and buy it. That was the Border hay day. Then they were the number one book store in America.</p>
<p>What happened?</p>
<p>Well, Amazon happened.  Amazon, after years of undercutting the prices of books, and not recording a profit, gradually won people over. I remember, with a little nervousness, purchasing my first book from Amazon, got their free shipping, it came in a week, and since I tend to have a couple of books I read at a time, I realized the delay was no big deal. The books arrived in good condition, I got a bargain price, and I was happy. I already knew I liked the book, I saw it at Borders.</p>
<p>Thus started Borders downfall. Once I purchased a few books from Amazon, I started going to Borders, like I always had, and like always, picked out the technical book I wanted, but instead of buying it right then and there, my curiosity got me. I wanted to read the Amazon reviews, and I wanted to see if I could get a lower price from Amazon.</p>
<p>In a way, I feel guilty about this. I used Borders to evaluate a book, and then went home and bought it from Amazon. This is the part of me that feels partly responsible for Borders demise, and makes me sorry to see Borders go away.</p>
<p>Then Amazon one upped itself and introduced the Kindle, followed by Barnes and Nobles Nook. The two eReaders took off, and where was Borders, not anywhere in the market. This accelerated Borders demise.</p>
<p>Now, we have Borders going out of business sale. They, like all companies, going out of business are gradually increasing their percentage discount to off load their inventory. I was there today, and they were giving 30% off on their technical books. That was good, I couldn't resist.</p>
<p>As usual, I hefted the books, went through the remaining inventory, found two books I liked, and I did what Amazon had taught me to do. I put them back on the shelf, and went home to look at Amazon's prices.  Unbelievable, Amazon was still lower by quite a bit, and they had the books in an eReader format, which means Borders was probably raising its prices on its books, as it increased their discount. Good old Borders right to the end.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Borders going out of business hurts us all. Who now is Amazon's competition? We will be ordering books we haven't seen. At prices we can't compare. How would you know if you got a good price or not? You wont.</p>
<p>We lost are check and balance, we lost our ability to look at the books before we buy, and yes, in the end we'll pay for it.</p>
<p>This article is in memoriam to Borders. I will truly miss spending many enjoyable hours thumbing through their books, and having a cup of coffee, while looking at my selections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/08/11/borders-going-out-of-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft under Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/07/26/microsoft-under-attack/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-under-attack</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/07/26/microsoft-under-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=3318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Microsoft finds itself in a box with competitors nipping at it from all sides. They're like a heavyweight boxer with a huge punch, and your not sure when they will explode. That huge punch is the awesome amount of &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/07/26/microsoft-under-attack/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Microsoft finds itself in a box with competitors nipping at it from all sides. They're like a heavyweight boxer with a huge punch, and your not sure when they will explode. That huge punch is the awesome amount of cash they have in reserve that they can throw in any direction to stay on top as the premier software manufacturer in the world. According to their FY11 Q1 statement they have a total stockholder equity of about $47 Million with about $8 Million of that in cash. How would you like to have $8M sitting around to do with whatever you want?<a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/skype2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3319" title="skype2" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/skype2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="214" /></a>The latest do is that Microsoft is acquiring Skype. Skype is a leading provider of internet communication streaming technology. They provide internet communications for video, messaging, and voice with some 170M connected users who log over 207B minutes a year over the Internet.</p>
<p>With Microsoft's move into the cloud computing, this seems like a smart move on their part, and will enhance Microsoft's cloud products. This should help their Lync enterprise instant messaging, which has experienced a 30% growth in revenue over last year.</p>
<p>One of Microsoft's games seems to be to expand their office offering to instantly communicate with anyone else in a company, with video, messaging, and voice over the Internet. They will have cloud computing office applications, so that anyone will be able to get to their work from anywhere in the world, and instantly communicate with their colleagues. Ah yes, let's sailboat around the world with a Netbook.</p>
<p>Microsoft revenue stars lately has been their Office products and their Xbox 360 with their motion sensor technology. The big loser has been their Windows 7 offering, because of the sudden surge in tablet sales, and a corresponding falling off of PC sales. Intel announced this week that PC sales would not be as strong as expected next year. Netbook sales are also off as tablet sales increase.</p>
<p>Bear in mind that 39.7% of Windows user are still running XP, while 37.8% have moved to Windows 7. Microsoft's latest strategy has their new Internet Explorer 9 browser not running on XP, to boost Windows 7 sales. And there is a gradual move toward Windows 7, maybe because of this, with a corresponding decline in XP.</p>
<p>The tablet market does not use the Microsoft operating system. Tablet computers are based either on Apple's iPad IOS4.3 operating system, or the Android operating system. Both of these are Linux based operating system. So every tablet sale is one less PC sale, and one less sale for Microsoft's Windows 7 operating system.</p>
<div id="attachment_3323" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 406px"><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ipadx.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-3323 " title="ipadx" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ipadx.jpg" alt="" width="396" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Apple iPad</p></div>
<p>As to tablets, Apple nearly tripled its iPad sales from the same quarter a year ago. Apple, initially, had complete dominance in the tablet market, now Android is coming on strong, and making major in roads. A year ago, Apple had 94% of the market, now they only own 61%. The beauty of Android is that you're not locked into the product's manufacturer, like you are with Apple and Microsoft.</p>
<div id="attachment_3324" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 325px"><a href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/galaxy.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-3324" title="galaxy" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/galaxy.jpg" alt="" width="315" height="386" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Android Samsung Galaxy</p></div>
<p>Windows is also under attack from both Apple and Linux for the PC operating system space with each gaining gradually in their market share. Let's not get too excited yet, according to W3Schools stats, Microsoft still owns about 86% of the market, Apple about 8.1%, and Linux about 5.2%. The point is the numbers for Apple and Linux are gradually increasing, while Microsoft's are declining.</p>
<p>The rest of the market is owned by mobile technology. According to the Gartner Group, Microsoft is a big loser in this market, even though they have a mobile solution, no one's using it.  They occupy a measly 3.6% of the market and declining.  The rest of the market is Symbian, 27.4%, and the Rim, 21.9%, operating systems declining rapidly; Apple's iPad and iPhone are steady at 16.8%; while the Android market is at 36% and rising rapidly. This market is starting to emerge, both the mobile and tablet market now account for 8% of Internet browsing in the US.</p>
<p>Despite the lagging Windows sales, Microsoft had a good quarter and beat estimates. They posted a profit of $5.87B up from $4.52B in the previous quarter a year ago. This came from Office sales and XBox sales, and an unusually low tax rate of 7%, which cut its taxes over $1B from the previous quarter a year ago. The tax break was from an increase in sales done through its offices outside the US.</p>
<p>As an aside, wake up Congress and start giving these corporations some tax breaks to stay in country. It's better to have some revenue, than none at all.</p>
<p>Given that most of Microsoft profits came from the tax breaks gotten from overseas sales, one has to look at Microsoft as a giant who is struggling to find areas to increase their revenue. One of Microsoft's bets is that the acquisition of Skype will increase their revenue by giving them new products to add to their Office portfolio.</p>
<p>One has to wonder if the ultimate computing product that everyone will want is an Android-based, eReader, Internet browsing, color, touch-sensitive, visible-in-sunlight tablet. If that's the case, Microsoft may end up like IBM, a has-been that has passed its prime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/07/26/microsoft-under-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple is bigger than Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/03/03/apple-is-bigger-than-microsoft-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apple-is-bigger-than-microsoft-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/03/03/apple-is-bigger-than-microsoft-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=2833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in awhile it's good to stick your head up above the stratosphere, and take a look at the industry from a 50,000 foot perspective. It sort of clears the air, and gives you a different perspective. To do &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/03/03/apple-is-bigger-than-microsoft-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in awhile it's good to stick your head up  above the stratosphere, and take a look at the industry from a 50,000 foot perspective.  It sort of clears the air, and gives you a different perspective.  To do this I decided to take a look at the most talked about technology companies by way of their FY2010 fiscal reports.  </p>
<p>The list may surprise you, first who's the biggest in terms of Total Revenue.<br />
<code></p>
<style type="text/css">
td {background-color:#B3D0F5; }
thead td{background-color: #B2ABFB;}
caption {color:#6E2A95; }
</style>
<table>
<caption>Biggest IT Companies by Total Revenue</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>Rank</td>
<td>Company</td>
<td>Total Revenue in Billions</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>HP</td>
<td>126.033</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>Verizon</td>
<td>107.808</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>IBM</td>
<td>99.870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>65.225</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>62.484</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Dell</td>
<td>52.902</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Cisco</td>
<td>40.040</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>29.321</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Oracle</td>
<td>26.820</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>Adobe</td>
<td>03.396</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></code></p>
<p>Next let's take a look at profits, the money left over after the companies pay their employees and all their expenses. A slightly different order emerges and something we can talk a little more about.</p>
<p><code></p>
<table>
<caption>Most Profitable Companies by Gross Profit</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>Rank</td>
<td>Company</td>
<td>Gross Profit in Billions</td>
<td>Profits as a % of Revenue</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Verizon</td>
<td>63.509</td>
<td>59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>IBM</td>
<td>46.014</td>
<td>46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>HP</td>
<td>29.944</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Cisco</td>
<td>25.643</td>
<td>64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Oracle</td>
<td>21.056</td>
<td>79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Google</td>
<td>18.904</td>
<td>64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>18.760</td>
<td>30%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>14.010</td>
<td>21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Dell</td>
<td>09.261</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></code></p>
<p>In talking about the Gross Profits,Verizon and IBM now are almost entirely service oriented businesses, so they should be more profitable then businesses that also sell hardware. Verizon spent a lot of money putting in their FIOS optical network together.  Now that its built, they can sit back and take in the money with very little expenses.</p>
<p>The percent of profits compared to total revenue is a more interesting number.  You could say that companies with a high profit margin are either mostly service oriented, as opossed to hardware companies, or there just gouging their customers.  Which are the best businesses for profit margin?  </p>
<p>Oracle is unbelievable.  Oracle has always been service oriented supporting their database products.   They have basically the same software database product since the late 1970's. Their pricing model is one of leasing their software at high rates, and charging high for services.  They have very little overhead, but a 79% profit is really gouging in my mind.</p>
<p>Google gets its revenue from advertising.  Google should have high margins, their revenue comes from ads, and there is very little overhead.  Yes, they had to build their distributed search network, to support their search engine, but that's pretty much built now and everything else is profit.</p>
<p>Cisco, the folks that make the hardware that powers the Internet, are more and more service oriented as folks need technical support to make sure their servers are configured properly and secured.  Cisco provides services, but they also provide hardware, which should make for lower profit margins. Their profit margin is high, because they charge high prices, and they can, because they almost have a monopoly in their industry. </p>
<p>Microsoft sells more software than hardware thus their profit percent is higher than Apples which gets a lot of their revenues from hardware.</p>
<p>HP has been known to charge more than their competitors for their hardware products and their profits show it.  </p>
<p>Poor Dell, just builds computers, so their profit margins are slim.</p>
<p>Who's growing the fastest?  This table shows the percent increase or decrease in total revenue from the previous FY2009 year.</p>
<p><code></p>
<table>
<caption>The Fastest Growing Companies</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>Company</td>
<td>Percent</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>+52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Google</td>
<td>+24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle</td>
<td>+15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cisco</td>
<td>+11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Verizon</td>
<td>+11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>HP</td>
<td>+10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>+07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IBM</td>
<td>+04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dell</td>
<td>-13%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></code></p>
<p>Which brings me to the title of this article.  Has Apple passed Microsoft?  This would have been thought impossible a couple of years ago.  </p>
<p>Let's make a comparison table, and I'm going to include Google, who may be the next 700lb gorilla to step forward, you be the judge.</p>
<p><code></p>
<table>
<caption>Apple versus Microsoft and Google</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>Category</td>
<td>Apple</td>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>Google</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Revenue</td>
<td>65.225B</td>
<td>62.484B</td>
<td>29.321B</td>
</tr>
<td>Revenue Growth</td>
<td>52%</td>
<td>7%</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Profits</td>
<td>14.01B</td>
<td>18.76B</td>
<td>18.904B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Assets</td>
<td>75.18B</td>
<td>86.113B</td>
<td>57.871B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Equity</td>
<td>47.79B</td>
<td>46.175B</td>
<td>46.241B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Employees</td>
<td>49,400</td>
<td>93,000</td>
<td>24,400</td>
</tr>
<p></code><br />
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It looks to me, in terms of Total Revenue, that Apple is now bigger than Microsoft, and growing much faster, with less mouths to feed.  By the way, Apple just announced the new IPad2, which is better technology at the same price.    Microsoft announced a new embedded CE software release, you get the idea.  Microsoft is a old gorilla gradually getting white hair and dying under its own weight.  Google has a "truck" to catch both Apple, and Microsoft, but they are sapping Microsoft's Internet revenues, and that certainly also is in Apple's favor. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2011/03/03/apple-is-bigger-than-microsoft-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Decline of MySQL ?</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/11/06/the-decline-of-mysql/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-decline-of-mysql</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/11/06/the-decline-of-mysql/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=2367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fellow worker showed me Oracle's MySQL pricing with their new pricing information yesterday. The prices were higher, and showed a change in what is included with licenses. I admit, I was a little surprised. After all, MySQL is supposedly &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/11/06/the-decline-of-mysql/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fellow worker showed me Oracle's MySQL pricing with their new pricing information yesterday.  The prices were higher, and showed a change in what is included with licenses. I admit, I was a little surprised. After all, MySQL is supposedly Open Source and free.</p>
<p>However, MySQL started with a slightly different licensing format than what we're use to as Open Source.   MySQL AB, the creator of MySQL, in 1995, came out with a license they termed, "Second Generation" Open Source. They did this with "dual licensing." The software is made available as Open Source,  but the licensing is retained by the company, and is used to sell licenses to companies that want support.  To increase revenue, MySQL AP introduced a multi-tiered support, and enterprise licenses.</p>
<p>MySQL AB was sold in 2008 for $1 Billion to Sun Microsystems.  Sun continued development, and dual licensing.  MySQL continued to grow and become the world's largest web based, open source, database.  Developers used it for small to medium size, non-enterprise, companies web sites. As the PHP language grew to be the premier web development language, it became more and more synonymous with MySQL.  So much so, that the next release will, supposedly, be even more tightly coupled with it.  MySql became number three overall, behind Microsoft SQL Server, and Oracle.</p>
<p>In 2009, Oracle, the second largest software company, found its revenues declining and it's market saturated, while MySQL installed licenses were rising. They were under heavy competition from Microsoft's SQL Server.</p>
<p>Their solution was to offer to buy Sun in April of 2009. The deal was not completed until the U.S. government agreed in August, 2009, and the European Commission agreed in January 2010, after a petition by over 50,000 developers against the sale.  As part of European Agreement, Oracle will maintain MySQL dual licensing until 2015. That's only four years from now.</p>
<p>From is past history, it seems obvious, that Oracle is on a mission, to become the world's largest software company.  Oracle sells its database in several versions, an Enterprise edition, a Standard Edition, Standard Edition One, and a Personal Edition.  These licenses can be sold by: user, processor, or cluster.  They have additional pricing for database utility tools.  Support is usually about 25% of the license price.</p>
<p>The prices they have released for MySQL will morph into Oracle's pricing structure.  The <a title="Oracle's MySQL pricing" href="http://www.mysql.com/products/">new prices</a> show a Standard, Enterprise and Cluster version.  We see Oracle continuing to raise prices.  Bear in mind, Oracle raised its prices 20% in 2008 and 40% in 2009 to boost their revenues.</p>
<p>Sun offered a reduced price Basic and Silver support.  Oracle is dropping that.  Users will need to upgrade to Gold Support.  If previous users want to keep their old support, Oracle will sell it to them only if they sign up for a three year contract.</p>
<p>MySQL Workbench, which replaced MySQL Admin and the Query Builder tool, all were free from Sun, not anymore.  You have to buy a license to get them. Oracle  also striped out some of the capabilities from the MySQL Open Source version, like the NDB storage engine, for example, and now charges for this.</p>
<p>You have the lay of the land, this leads us to question the fate of Sun open source software that Oracle now owns: besides MySQL, there's OpenOffice, Java, and along with Java, Glassfish. We'll stick with MySQL for this article.  Here's our prediction of Oracle's future direction, given their past history, and the way they've previously marketed their products.</p>
<p>Look for Oracle not to drop it's Open Source version after 2015.  It will keep a stripped down version available to entice new users to their revenue stream when they need to upgrade, and to claim they still support the Open Source community.  The prices for MySQL will steadily climb.  This will kill MySQL as the database of choice for web development.  Look for MySQL to decline in use.</p>
<p>The decline will not be immediate, it will take some time, notably Apache distributions like XAMPP and WAMP will have to offer users alternatives to MySQL, as most developers use these packages, instead of installing products independently.</p>
<p>All is not lost, the Open Source community has plenty of options.  There are several good database choices, all open source and free.  When the Sun sale was announced, there were several forks taken of MySQL: <a title="Drizzle" href="https://launchpad.net/drizzle">Drizzle</a>, <a title="MariaDB" href="http://mariadb.org/">MariaDB</a>, <a title="Percona Server" href="http://www.percona.com/software/percona-server/">Percona Server</a>, and <a title="OurDelta" href="http://ourdelta.org/">OurDelta</a>.  Each has a slightly different goal moving forward.  There are two well established alternatives to MySQL:  <a title="PostgreSQL" href="http://www.postgresql.org/about/">PostgreSQL</a> and <a href="http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php?id=about-firebird&amp;nosb=1">Firebird</a>.  Both have large established communities, and support of major corporations. One of these will become the next MySQL, we're not sure which one yet, with a slight nod toward PostgreSQL, and then Firebird.</p>
<p>This reminds me of the old quote, first uttered in 1422 at the coronation of French King Charles VII, after the death of his father, Charles VI, "The King is dead.  Long live the King." Just maybe we're a bit premature, but we see it coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/11/06/the-decline-of-mysql/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Won’t Search</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/03/17/google-wont-search/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-wont-search</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/03/17/google-wont-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of a portal, I use Google as my home page in my browser. I like the clean look, and when I'm looking for something, I don't want to be distracted by a lot of information that you would find &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/03/17/google-wont-search/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of a portal, I use Google as my home page in my browser.  I like the clean look, and when I'm looking for something, I don't want to be distracted by a lot of information that you would find in most portals.</p>
<p>Recently I had a problem with Google.  I typed in my query into the Google window, hit the search button, and nothing happen, no search results.  Hmmm...what's going on?</p>
<p>Let me digress for a moment to a pet peeve of mind.  People who make software programs are human and want to make money just like the next guy. A way that software distributors make extra money is to load someone elses companion program along with their application.  This companion program is usually made to be unobtrusive, not easily noticed, and usually is implemented in the form of a toolbar in your browser's upper window.  The "Ask toolbar" is probably the biggest culprit of this technique at the moment. </p>
<p>Normally when you load a utility program, during the installation, they give you a check box to uncheck, if you don't want the toolbar loaded, but sometimes they just load it.  Well behaved toolbars that suddenly pop up in your browser, usually can be turned off by right clicking on the toolbar, and turning off the toolbar you don't want.</p>
<p>Back to the problem.  Microsoft with their new Bing Search engine is desperate, and I do mean desperate, to gain market share in the search engine wars.  They've decided to go the way of the "Ask toolbar" and load their toolbar into your browser when you load utility programs.  This toolbar loads without an option not to load, and it puts their Bing search box prevalently in the upper left window, where you go for the "back" button.</p>
<p>Most folks, will not initially notice it, but if they do, and want to turn it off, a right click in the toolbar will not find the Microsoft Bing toolbar in the list of toolbars, not nice.</p>
<p>When a Google search does not return search results, I could see an unsuspecting user going right up to the Bing search bar, and doing their search from there, just what Microsoft wants. </p>
<p>Knowing and loving Microsoft the way I do, and seeing the Bing search box on my toolbar, I immediately suspected that there was some foul play going on here. I decided to get rid of the Bing toolbar. It turns out the only way to do that was to go to "Add Remove Programs" in the Control Panel.  Once I removed the Microsoft Bing toolbar, and restarted my browser, the Google search results miraculously returned.</p>
<p>Now I'm not saying that Microsoft would make a toolbar that would interfere with the operation of a competitor's program. I know Microsoft would never do that intentionally.  They might change the format of Word documents with every release to make competitors trying to open their documents not be able to do that without a lot of work.  Nor would I ever accuse Microsoft of intentionally slowing your computer down with every security update, so you would think your computer was getting old and slow, and go buy a new computer and operating system.  I'm sure Microsoft only has benevolent intentions.</p>
<p>No, I'm just writing this post to let you know how to fix the problem if you find that Google will not give you search results, and you happen to have a Bing search box in your browser toolbar. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/03/17/google-wont-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle acquires Sun</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/01/28/oracle-acquires-sun/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=oracle-acquires-sun</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/01/28/oracle-acquires-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, this is big. It is no secret that Sun has fallen on some tough times lately. Sun had a total revenue of $11.45 billion last year down from $13.88 billion the year before. In contrast, Oracle's last year revenues &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/01/28/oracle-acquires-sun/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is big.  It is no secret that Sun has fallen on some tough times lately.  Sun had a total revenue of $11.45 billion last year down from $13.88 billion the year before.  In contrast, Oracle's last year revenues were $23.23 Billion.  The combined revenues of both companies should approach $35 billion.  Microsoft currently checks in at $56.3 billion.  We're looking at the heavy weights going at it.  With Microsoft on the decline, Google at $23.65 billion on the rise, and now Oracle stepping up into the fray, this may become a very interesting war.  Oracle acquired Sun for a mere $7.4 billion, a steal.</p>
<p>Oracle's revenue comes from it's pervasive Oracle database.  Depending on how you look at it revenue, or installs. Oracle is in the top 2 with Microsoft and IBM's DB2 a close third.  Let's not forget, MySql is the most popular Open Source, i.e free, database in the world.  What is surprising is when you look at installs and the number of developers developing with a database, MySql comes in a close 3rd to Oracle and Microsoft, with DB2 fourth, and MySql shows the greatest growth rate of all database development. </p>
<p>Oracle's acquisition of the MySql product may be a problem for the Open Source community.  Sun owned MySQL, which now belongs to Oracle. If you remember, Oracle purchased PeopleSoft in Dec. 2004 for $10.3 billion. In Oct, 2005 they acquired Innobase which is an integral part of MySql for transaction processing and foreign keys. What will Oracle do with MySql has caused a huge concern with the Open Source Community, so much so, that their already has been several forks of MySql, Drizzle, and MariaDB, just in case Oracle starts charging for MySql.  For now, Oracle pledges to leave MySql independent, but this is to be expected in the initial stages of an acquisition, things usually change in six months or so.</p>
<p>My thought is they will continue to support an Open Source MySql and build on top of MySql additional tools, extensions, and integrations with other Oracle products with, of course, a clear upgrade path to Oracle's flagship products for which the enterprise users will pay dearly.</p>
<p>And the same for OpenOffice.org, a legitimate contender, now, of Microsoft Office.  Oracle has never had an Office Suite and has wanted one.  Oracle is built with Java, as is OpenOffice.org.  Again, tools, extensions, and integrations with Oracle products seems like a nice way to get users to start paying for more and more functionality from a previously non-existent Oracle Office Products.</p>
<p>Oracle keeping the Open Source products they have acquired free, and enhancing them, at first, to gain market share seems like good business sense, but as these applications gain more and more market share, I believe Oracle will take a page from Microsoft's play book, and start charging for their enhancements to the products.  What this means for Open Source, is a freezing of the Open Source components to a minimal feature level, and if you want more, pay for it.</p>
<p>I have great faith in Open Source software, the forking of MySql is evidence that independent Open Source Developers will continue to create other applications with the missing functionality, that Oracle will ask customers to purchase.  As MySql has emerged as the premier Open Source database, so other products can, and will, emerge to take its place, if Oracle begins to get as "bean counterish" as Microsoft is currently, with it prideful boasting about "Microsoft Genuine Advantage," and its publicly crowing about the number of companies they have sued, look for any closing down, of previously Open Source  Oracle  products to be a catalyst to breed a new generation of improved Open Source products.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2010/01/28/oracle-acquires-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft OEM version</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/09/29/microsoft-oem-version/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-oem-version</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/09/29/microsoft-oem-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I called Microsoft Customer Support the other day.   I was impressed.  I got an actual person to talk to in a relatively short time after going through the usual  telephone system automatic pick a number if it fits your &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/09/29/microsoft-oem-version/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called Microsoft Customer Support the other day.   I was impressed.  I got an actual person to talk to in a relatively short time after going through the usual  telephone system automatic pick a number if it fits your problem.</p>
<p>I can't say that I hung up happy, in fact, I finished the call  downright angry.  What was the problem?  About a year and half ago, I had built a computer. and paid for and installed the OEM version of Vista Home Premium as the operating system.</p>
<p>For those of you who have not looked at operating system pricing, the OEM version, as opposed to the Retail version,  is supposedly for system manufactures and integrators who build systems.</p>
<p>To continue the story, the system crashed and in the process took out the power supply and motherboard.  There was nothing wrong with the disk drives, and I still had Vista and all my data on the drives.   So I purchased a new power supply and motherboard, and connected everything up.</p>
<p>That's when I found out my system wouldn't boot.  What was the problem.  Well, in one word, Microsoft.  It turns out if you have an OEM copy of the operating system, It can only be reinstalled on a system with the exact same make and model of motherboard as where it was originally installed. My original motherboard was obsolete, so I was in a "Catch-22."</p>
<p>What did Microsoft Customer Support say, "Well, that's our policy."  Which made me instantly angry.  To paraphrase heir policy, we know you build systems, and that you repair systems, but if your customer has a problem with his motherboard, which needs replacing, you'll have to buy a new operating system, of course, you could have bought the retail version initially, hint, hint.  In order to get up and running I had to purchase another license.  Pay another $200 to turn a software switch on.</p>
<p>You would think that Microsoft would give its partners a break, which it supposedly does by making the OEM version about $100 less than the retail version.  But as you can see from this experience, you are better off initially buying the retail version.</p>
<p>Better yet, your better off boycotting Microsoft products all together.   Is that possible?  I believe so, yes,  I've just ordered the parts for a new computer.  It's purpose is to prove to myself that I, or anyone else for that matter, don't need to use Microsoft products.   That you can still have a fully functional computer without using Microsoft products.   I believe Microsoft is going the way of IBM, a has-been, and has peaked.  And I aim to do my part to help Microsoft along.  Yep, I guess you could say, "that's my new policy."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/09/29/microsoft-oem-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office free?</title>
		<link>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/05/03/microsoft-office-free/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-office-free</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/05/03/microsoft-office-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 23:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daleV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekgumbo.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is scrambling to get out its replacement operating system for Vista to bring up its revenues.  The replacement, Windows 7,  will try to get corporate America and the government weaned away from XP.  Vista has largely failed to meet &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/05/03/microsoft-office-free/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-117" title="office4-1" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/office4-1.png" alt="office4-1" width="125" height="101" /> <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-119" title="office2-1" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/office2-1.png" alt="office2-1" width="125" height="92" /></p>
<p>Microsoft is scrambling to get out its replacement operating system for Vista to bring up its revenues.  The replacement, Windows 7,  will try to get corporate America and the government weaned away from XP.  Vista has largely failed to meet expectations.  It is slower than XP with many annoying features, like UAC, User Account Control.  That's not to say Windows 7  will be much better.  It will have UAC only with four choices instead of two.</p>
<p>In an effort to get Windows 7 out by Q3 2009, Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's CEO, announced that a new version of Office will NOT be released with Windows 7.  This is a switch from previous releases where both were released at the same time to enhance both revenue streams, and signals a separation of operating sytem and Office development.</p>
<p>This separation is real, and led to several interesting developments.   You will not have to have Windows 7  to run Office 14.  It will still be supported on XP.   Office 14 will have a new format that will support XML-based file format Open Office XML (ODF). Microsoft has been fighting against this to try to keep to its own Open Document Format (OOXML).  It looks like it will give in on this one.</p>
<p>And in a big twist, Stephen Elop, Microsoft Business Division Chief  announced that Office 14 may offer a FREE ad supported version.  In other words, you can get it for free, if your willing to look at ads while you work. Elop said it was to fight piracy, but we think that the complete $400 plus package of Office from Microsoft is under a lot of pressure from OpenOffice.org.  Sales must be hurting given OpenOffice.org is free.   Elops sees it has a chance to get upgrade revenues later on.   I guess, if the ads are annoying enough, people will spring for the $200-$500 to upgrade, but we don't think so.  Hopefully, the ads will replace the ribbon. <img src='http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Office 14, the new release, now will not be released until 2010.   In the meantime, we thought we'd tease you with some advanced shots of the new Office 14.   These are compliments of the Office 14 Alpha release and was leaked by the Russian web site, Wzor.  We know, we know, the images are small, if you like an even closer look try <a title="Office14 screenshots" href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/01/15/office-14-alpha-screenshots-leak">here</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-120" title="office1-1" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/office1-1.png" alt="office1-1" width="125" height="102" /> <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-123" title="office3-11" src="http://www.geekgumbo.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/office3-11.png" alt="office3-11" width="125" height="87" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekgumbo.com/2009/05/03/microsoft-office-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

